criminalises all electronic communication that is
"grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character".
i.e. Almost anything could be illegal.
Certainly the Bible and Koran are illegal.
All Internet porn is illegal in the UK.
Saying "fuck" on the Internet is illegal in the UK.
"offensive" speech is rampant in the UK.
In Nov 2012,
some guy called
burns a poppy and posts it on the Internet.
So what. You know
what I think of such people.
But he is then
arrested by Kent police!
This is an outrage.
Is burning the poppy illegal now?
Is burning the Koran illegal?
(Yes, it seems.)
Is burning the Bible illegal?
The right and the counterjihad
(all friends of the troops, like me)
are appalled at the arrest of Linford House.
As a prank,
taught his girlfriend's dog to become excited by the phrase "Do you want to gas the Jews?"
and to make a little Hitler salute.
I actually laughed out loud watching it, since I am a dog person and
I have done similar nonsense talk to dogs (minus the Nazi theme).
I thought it was just daft humour, not pro-Nazi at all.
But in modern Britain, in the 21st century,
Meechan actually got a hate crime conviction for this joke in Mar 2018.
I sometimes wonder if Freedom House should downgrade Britain to "Partly Free".
The very fact that you can censor movies in the cinema, on video and on TV
only shows how flawed these old media are.
TV is simply far too easy to control.
Around the world, every dictatorship and oppressor uses state control of TV
to spread government lies and suppress the news.
state TV is the voice of the oppressor, and the spreader of lies,
imagined it would be.
In the disturbing new world of the Internet,
governments everywhere must be longing for the return of TV.
Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution
is basically a green light to all forms of censorship.
It states that we have free speech, and yet:
"The publication or utterance of blasphemous,
matter is an offence which shall be punishable in accordance with law."
We really do have a crap constitution.
Thank heavens it isn't enforced.
The uselessness of this Article was highlighted again recently
by the ability to make a law banning
ads for religion on TV and radio.
The "Power to Change" group was banned from the airwaves,
but their material can be read
Natural Born Killers (1994)
was also banned.
Although I think this film is painful rubbish,
being anti-censorship does not mean you're only against censorship of things you like.
Otherwise it is a meaningless term.
In fact, a lot of so-called liberals who claim to be anti-censorship
turn out only to be against censorship of things that have
artistic or intellectual merit.
Whether a film has any artistic merit or not is irrelevant
- the worst you should be able to do with anything is simply classify it for adults-only.
Actually banning any film or book for adult consumption is an outrageous abuse of law.
Who I block:
I will debate almost anyone.
I love ideas.
I will not debate (and will block) people who:
(a) target my job,
(b) target my appearance, or:
(c) libel me (such as call me racist).
I will not debate such people.
I will block them.